Posted on Dec 29, 2010 in Sex | 113 comments
Guess what, my boyfriend has one and I think it’s perfectly fine. Actually, it’s awesome because it hits that certain spot perfectly. I don’t think I’d want to go back to being with someone who doesn’t have one. Get over it, it’s just freaking skin and definitely not worth dumping someone over. Talk about shallow.
Was this answer helpful?
It’s great that your love your boyfriends foreskin and i agree that it’s not worth dumping someone because they are uncircumcised, but I don’t blame the OP for disliking foreskin. It’s like someone preferring blondes over brunettes, it’s just a preference. Having said that I think dumping a boyfriend for not being circumcised is extremely immature and ridiculous.
it isnt just preference. dotn proffer ignorance. circumcision is a sign of backward culture and uneducated populace mutilating there children at will without factual basis. the idea a women can choose a circumcised male as a preference to an intact male is just further reinforcement for this barbaric crime. women should support male childrens right to be free from medically unnecessary sadistic procedures. the male can choose when he is an adult, to take that choice form him is a crime. to say it is a preference will pressure men and parents to mutilate their children. If you truly feel this way after educating yourself then keep it to yourself, we must not advocate criminal behavior.
This is a decision that seems to be haerdr for parents of our generation to make. My husband and I decided that we would circumcise our boys. In my experience, most boys (and in fact, most children) are not the cleanest of creatures. You can teach them to bathe, but unless you are going to supervise their showers for the first ten or so years, you really have very little hope of them all paying close attention to detail. Having served in the military, I know there are times when, even if you were so inclined, cleanliness is not always an option. I’ll spare you all the anecdotal evidence, but there was plenty to support our decision the most impressive to me being a forced circumcision on a young relative who had reached the age of reason, yet not shown the necessary habits of cleanliness to prevent painful and constant infections. If you think circumcision at birth is traumatic, imagine having to explain it to an older boy who KNOWS he’s about to lose part of his penis. I do NOT write this to try to get you to second guess your decision. Your confidence and the joint decision making with your spouse are more than enough to convince me that you made the right choice for your family. I am also sure that with proper training your son can do a terrific job of maintaining his personal hygeine. I am simply taking up your offer to defend the alternate choice. I was not comfortable with inflicting pain on our sons, but I tend to group circumcision in with vaccines. To borrow the statement of another poster on the HPV board prevention is prevention . Congratulations on the birth of your son and best wishes for your family!
You and your husband are fucking idiots
There is NO way an intact penis can ever be as clean as a circumcised one. A foreskin is a breeding ground for bacterial growth. That it disgusts some women is understandable and exercising a preference for a clean penis is not shallow – it is a valid choice. SHE gets to decide who she will be intimate with and if he has a foreskin and it disgusts her – she is not in any way obligated to continue a relationship with this fellow.
forced male genital mutilation is an abomination and disgrace. elective circumcision by of age adult males is a choice. circumcision at birth should be a crime like any mutilating practice that isnt medically required. obvious and simple.
Guess what, my boyfriend has one and I think it’s perfectly fishy. Actually, it’s awesome because it infects that certain spot periodically. I don’t think I’d want to go back to being with someone who doesn’t have one. Get over it, it’s just freaking stinky and definitely not worth dumping someone over. Talk about smegma.
ridiculous. a male with basic hygiene has a clean foreskin. the odor is slimier in nature to a females but generally less so. if you find either male or female smells stinky then i can only suppose your olfactory sense is unable to recognize the encoded erotic delight of clean and natural human sex scents. evidently going to low your mind here but women produce smegma in the same manor as men. please read something.
Its not shallow if he played peek-a-boo with it like it was sexy and as a means to try to turn me on. If you like sucking on a little extra something then by all means go for it. Have fun playing with your man’s elephant trunk, anteater looking nasty penis. And try not to choke on the extra flapping skin ya weirdo! =)
I hate clitoral hoods. All women should have them chopped off at birth. Go to hell bitch.
well you be a big success with the ladies with that little attitude of yours – idiot. Women are the final arbitrators of whom they choose to be intimate with. If a foreskin repulses them – I mean if it is dirty and stinks you really think she wants you to put it in her mouth or elsewhere? A clitoral hood is no where near the same issue – it just is not that large and as a consequence it does not trap anywhere near the same quantity of junk under it – plus unlike a male foreskin women don’t urinate through their glans – men do and it holds that stinking stale urine under their foreskins. Women have good reason to be disgusted with a foreskin. The responsible choice is circumcision – and there is nothing wrong with a clean cut penis and a whole lot right about it – circumcised men are not sexual cripples. Intact men mostly tend to stink or worse.
It’s not some sort of freak mutation, it’s a dick in its natural form. You’re telling us that you prefer MUTILATED GENITALS to a penis in its natural state.
Oh, and stop being so up tight. I play games with my cock in front of my girlfriend to amuse her, and she thinks it’s hilarious.
By the way, you’re supposed to retract the foreskin if you’re sucking on it. Kind of like how I’d retract the clitoral hood to suck on the clitoris.
ummm, the foreskin is packed with nerves… involving it in oral is preferable for most men. also its advisable to not always just suck on the clit directly during oral with a women. you can be more subtle and only go all the way to direct hood free play towards the end.
genius. is you have medically valid factual basis for supporting forced at birth circumcision pleas feel free to present them, otherwise you are simply supporting a crime against male infants. the forced removal of flesh from a person without justified medical cause is clearly mutilation. grow up.
Thanks, I surely will! If you take a little looksie at the ratings apparently most people also think you’re a shallow twat. I’m gonna go get sucking now, have a lovely day!
lol thats because the ones who rated are probably are uncut themselves or have bf’s who arent. Im sure the jews back me up on this one. So toodles ya nasty!
That’s like asking extremist muslims to back your opinions on terrorism.
my husband is an uncut ethnic jew from russia and so good and so generous and rocks my world.
Nope, I’m cut and think you’re a shallow twat, too.
You can keep your culturally infused fetish for mutilated dicks. I’m personally a little irritated I didn’t get the choice to have a piece of me cut off as an infant. WTF is up with that shit?
1.) Dictated by a book written by a bunch of bronze-age sheep herders, full of holes, contradictions, and logical impossibilities.
2.) Deliberately designed to undermine sexual pleasure.
However, I’m certain you’re too entrenched in your thinking to listen to reason, or to consider anything that has been spoon-fed to you could be in error.
You must be ignorant because I dont recall making any terrorist statements so therefore STFU and shave your shit. You probably have foreskin too (if you’re a guy) which would make it a double negative.
so I am just wondering why a litlte boys genitals are such a big issue these days? this is such a big topic and it need not be. if any other grown man besides a doctor was so concerned about your sons genitals you would find it creepy. I know I would. I think that it should be the sons choice later in life cause it can’t be reversed. you cant cut off something just cause you THINK something bad could happen. there are plenty of websites and resources to give you the full details about it and the good and bad you wouldn’t cut off anything else on your baby (boy or girl) so why is the penis such a big deal? its just like saying well I may have liver problems one day so go ahead and cut it out. As for the clean issue, the foreskin is fused to the head for the first 7-8 years of the boys life and even then you don’t have to pull it back and scrub it or anything this is a non issue people are just misinformed and don’t realize what they are doing my advice is research as much as possible when it comes to any irreversable surgery cause you cant take it back and I don’t think its fair for the parent to decide something like that. America is the only country in which this is such a big issue other countries in Europe and such think that its crazy and insane to do things like this to their son. Just research it.
UPDATE: 81 loves 46 hates
P.S. Foreskin is gross. Maybe not worth dumping someone over, but certainly a reason to never begin a relationship in the first place.
Oh yea, I’d prioritize the question “are you circumcised” over “what’s your name” next time you meet a guy.
Foreskin definitely shouldn’t be revolting, but I can understand the disgust when someone is constantly showing it off.
Foreskin is disgusting, my ex wasn’t circumcised either, though thats not why it ended. It was like giving a blowjob to Snuffleupagus.
I have foreskin intact (ie my penis is in its original, natural condition, undamaged by scalpal or other severing implement) and I have a few bits of information.
If you were giving a guy with foreskin a BJ and somehow got tangled up in skin, you were either blowing a guy with a LOT of extra foreskin, because once erect, the foreskin is not exactly very loose. Certainly not loose enough to get in the way of your job. OR, his dick wasn’t erect, which means you were doing terribly.
As for claims of disgust in response to foreskin, please. Genital alterations are weird, sometimes disgusting. Genital mutilation of any type is weird, and forced surgery on genitals is actually disgusting. The rest of you, concerned with appearance, or minor variations in mouthfeel when giving head, need to grow up and realize that dicks have feelings too. And dicks with foreskins have more feeling than those without. Be nice, you ignorant bitches.
You’re so damned right!!!
Girl, you should come over here and live the European way!!
No mutilation of penises and only happy women and men!!!
There is nothing more sexy than my husband’s unmutilated dick. If only the stupid bitches realized that the foreskin all but disappears into make the penis nice and thick – they would beg for it. I love my man and am so thankful his parents didn’t allow this horrific ABUSE. My son is intact and proud of it too!
A penis is a penis…Extra skin or not,it gets the job done.
Its defiantly NOT a deal breaker..
Having foreskin is the norm and to me it sounds idiotic to dump someone for it. It sounds as stupid as a guy dumping his girlfriend for not having undergone clitoridectomy (which is just another form of mutilation like the one you are supporting here).
You (and the rest who support this comment) better re-establish your stance on life and other people.
All you “foreskin lovers” are disgusting. Have fun with those dirty dicks. Here’s a fact for you, CIRCUMCISION IS THE NORM!!!! FREAKS!
How can circumcision be the norm when it isn’t the way men are born….? There are more uncut men in the world than cut. It’s not like they follow that practice in third world countries, man.
How can circumcision be the norm when it isn’t the way men are born? How can siamese twins be separated when it’s the way they are born?! How can hundreds of millions of girls dye their hair when it goes against their natural hair color?!
It’s called an improvement, you fuckwad.
It’s only the norm in America. 90% of men have it done. Don’t blame us because we have been spoon fed this mutilated culture. I personally prefer my men circumcised because that is what I am used to.
only 56% of male babies in the usa are circumcised now days. knowledge that circumcision is male genital mutilation is gaining ground rapidly.
I only have girls, so this wasn’t something we had to cdneiosr. I’ve always heard that you most likely want your boys to look like their daddy…although I think my hubby would most likely have chosen a different path than his own, had we had a son.Your title of this post, I think, is a perfect one, though. Whether it’s this…or so many other things…we’re all making the best decisions we can on behalf of our children. Let’s hope we’re also teaching them perseverance and perspective in the face of adversity.
Dear mr rawdogg, facts straight much? the upper estimate for the global rate of circumcision is 30% and likely declining… http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prevalence_of_circumcision
The Circumcision Resource Center claims “Over 80 percent of the world’s males are intact”.
circumcision now days is almost exclusively religious with 70% of all circumcised males in the world been Muslim.
deal with it.
1. ANY penis, vagina, butthole, mouth, tits, etc. have the same potential of looking, feeling and smelling “unusual”. Of course, what is usual and unusual is entirely dictated by the life experience of the person observing said body part. What a ridiculous statement to say the circumcision is the norm…why, because it is normal to YOU? It never ceases to amaze me when I read though forums which debate this topic. It always seems at least 90% of the pro circumcision folks come off as being as ignorant an uneducated as can be. I’ll get through reading a paragraph from someone defending UNCUT dicks that is well thought out and full of facts and real examples…always seems to be followed up by some fool who was cut as a baby, and who had absolutely nothing to do with the decision to have been cut, say “CUT COCKS ARE NORMAL, UNCUT ONES ARE GROSS”…the idea of being a male, who never had foreskin, who never had any real reason to like or dislike it, make such a bold statement against it. It’s such obvious blind marching behind other blind marchers. You were cut, you can’t go back, so you feel compelled to defend your irreversible state. It’s as natural for you to do so as it is for me to recognize your ignorance.
I am uncut… My foreskin does NOT hang over the head of my cock like an elephant trunk. I have been with some of the hottest women on the planet…they all prefer my cock to their previous lover, cut or otherwise.
For those foreskin haters out there, let’s take a look at the huge elephant in the room. If it is okay to do it to men, why not women? How many of you will sit their at your computers talking about male gentile mutilation, and how you are all for it, but will get angry if someone comes on here and suggests women should have their clitorises removed? And trust me, this is coming from someone who was forced under the knife at birth, because it is “cleaner and healthier”.
COMPLETELY DIFFERENT CONCEPT. Female circumcision makes it impossible for a woman to enjoy sex, and even makes sex painful. If a man is circumcised or not, he can still enjoy sex regardless. Please never, EVER equate the two. This is coming from someone who was in the Peace Corps in Mali, where the majority of women were violently mutilated as girls because their sexuality was “dirty” and “evil.” You can say that male circumcision is violent too, but the fact remains only in very rare cases does it affect sexual pleasure to the point where it is impossible.
Male and Female cutting is exactly the same. I was cut at birth and I hate it because I can’t enjoy sex. I have little to no feeling down there and actually have trouble penetrating because I can’t feel it. The only sexual experience I had that was actually enjoyable was a blow job and I only really felt her tongue licking my head. I wish I could of felt her lips on my shaft. The shaft still hurts around the scar. If you actually researched male circumcision you’d see it’s exactly the same.
jenna587, i respect your commitment to a better world and time spent in the peace corps. please note that in a very real way they are slimier. women with there clitoris head removed can still enjoy sex. much of the clitoris is still in place with in the deeper tissues, the roots etc. the clitoris is also not the only erogenous zone that can give pleasure. Removal of the foreskin may significantly reduce male sexual please and may also impact female sexual please. the data is not clear though. wither way removing the clitoris is the forced removal of tissue, as is the forced removal of the foreskin. as such they can be equated as crimes of forced mutilation. generally female genital mutilation is more damaging. never the less both are extremely serious crimes. it is useful to feed off the success of the fight against forced female genital mutilation to help show people why male forced genital mutilation is wrong.
The only procedure on a woman that can be compared to foreskin removal would be clitoral HOOD removal. Removing the entire clitoris would be analogous to cutting off the entire penis, and THAT is mutilation. Believe it or not there are women in the world who have elected to have their hoods pierced, split or removed, and many say it *increases* sexual pleasure.
so clitoral hood removal is *not* like cutting the foreskin off its like giving a man 2 times the nerve endings… i.e. a reverse circumcision
the foreskin is packed with nerves and is a large surface area that changes the mechanics of sex. it is not the same a clitoral hood even though they are embryonically analogous. there are other differences as well but i wont labor. removing the hood exposes the clitoris. the same is not the case for the foreskin, it naturally retracts during erection. never the less any form of forced tissue removal without medical reason is mutilation. i am unsure of your sexual experiance but the vast majority of women find the hood a important sexual element as the glans clitoris is often to sensitive to suffer sustained direct stimulation. this is widely documented and even a wiki search will give you a basic understanding:
*replaces clitris bu inner lip flap to make his argument somewhat valid*
Now hold on Mr. Unhappy with his clean circumcised penis…. What was done to you was your parents decision and it was done for you not too you with love and with the best of intentions. It was fully their right to circumcise you and in your life it rates as but one of the less important decisions that was made for you.
Next up – it is NOT mutilation – Mutilation impairs function and your penis works fine for the two purposes it was intended for – urination and sex. When a woman in Africa has her clitoris sliced off – well that is mutilation as it removes function. Nope – circumcision is an IMPROVEMENT not only for you but for your partners and their health as well.
many untrue comments here. removal of the foreskin is widely documented to impair function.
a small number of babies die following circumcision (impaired function)
some loss the ability to enjoy sex (impaired function)
most have reduced sensitivity during sex (impaired function)
the glide mechanic is eliminated (impaired function)
a parent may not stab pencils in to the arms and legs of their children, even though it does not sticky significantly impair the function of the limbs.
some females who have been genitally mutilated still can enjoy sex and orgasm, they are still mutilated.
as such it is clearly NOT a right for parents to circumcision there children without clear medical cause. parents that do act out of ignorance not love.
WHAT A RIDICULOUS STATEMENT!!! Do you really think I’m going to let you get away with that. Did you just invent your very own definition of mutilation? Does not impair function? You are not a doctor. You have absolutely NO educational background to suggest that you know what functions the foreskin is responsible for. Your remark would suggest that forekin is some kind of a mistake made by nature…some completely innate part of our body that has no function or purpose…YET WE ALL HAVE ONE AT BIRTH. If you ask most people in private when they are comfortable and being honest, they will admit that they had their child cut for the sake of said child’s sex life.
AND, based on YOUR definition of mutilation, should also be entirely legal to tatoo a child’s enire body at birth, pierce their ears, lips, nose, bleach their skin, and have laser hair removal done over their entire body. This child would be unmutilated in all of the same ways that a boy circumcised at birth would be.
So please, defend the full body tatooing, piercing, bleaching, and hair removal of a newborn. I’ll be waiting for your educated rebuke.
Wow this one was so stupid, that I must react.
Foreskin is important, IT IS NOT AN IMPROVEMENT AT ALL AND IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH HEALTH NEITHER IT PROTECTS THE PARTNER IN SLIGHTEST WAY FROM ANY HEALTH ISSUES. It significantly decreases sexual pleasure not just for men, but also women.
I am woman and I had both-circumcised and uncircumcised partners-and I never ever want to have circumcised one again, it totally destroys sex life-playing with almost senseless fully exposed glans is disgusting.
And all those “arguments” like it is healthier, cleaner and looks better, are total bullshit. cleanliness and bacteria growth is the same-circumcised or not and regarding aesthetic point of view, it is much more sexy when the skin retracts and exposes fully perfused glans than those of circumcised man, that are always visible, colorless and considerably less sensitive.
I really wonder which idiot started to think that this kind of mutilation is good, healthy or any improvement for sexual life, because it considerably decreases pleasure on both sides.
To the women who don’t like foreskin:
You have more folds of skin between your legs than men with foreskin do between theirs.
Thus, you are hypocrites for ridiculing their genitals.
Logically pwned. Thank you very much.
*internet high five*
Hey I’m european and circumcision is pretty rare, unless you do it for religious reasons which is fine. Uncircumcised flutes are not dirty: skin back, wash, skin forward. Sorted. RE Rawdogg: It isn’t the norm man, you’re born uncircumcised therefore that is normal/the norm. Plus no wonder you’re raw with your helmet rubbing off your pants all day. RE Roxellana: if they’re constantly showing it off it doesn’t matter if it’s cut or not. Either they’re five or or they’re as mad as a bag of frogs anyway. Where I come from constantly showing it off (in whatever condition) is considered perverted and is an arrestable offence.
mutilation for religious purposes is probably not justified.
Circumcision is the NORM in America. I suggest “the gonk” gets educated about the traditions of a socialized society. Maybe uncircumcision is the norm in Europe cause they are still living in the 1200′s.
Tradition for tradition’s sake is the social equivalent of public masturbation.
You do know that 65% of men in North America are born and remain uncircumsized? Doesn’t sound like the “norm” to me
obesity is the norm in america too
Another typical uneducated, narrow-minded twat who has never set foot outside of America! I bet you think the rest of the planet live in trees.
You’re the one that needs to be educated. The U.S. are the ones living in the past for continuing a religious tradition that has no real medical benefits with modern day creams that can cure any health problem an uncut penis may have. Circumcision rates in the U.S. have actually been dropping but is still the only country that does it.
you are the idiot, read this factual study….sorry but I would rather listen to science, facts, and doctors than you.
so go ahead and enlighten me to how it is better? yeah….it isn’t.
I did. I had an attorney, we had a very solid case, Everything was on the fast track but just beorfe the statute of limitations ran out we were waiting on some type of an approval from the medical examiner (not exactly sure why or what for.) but the medical examiner didn’t agree with the case. beorfe my attorney had a chance to find another one the statute ran out. I to this day don’t know what the medical examiner had to do with any thing This really messed me up, I wish I could let this go.
rawdogg you are ignorant stupido, nothing more. Norm is what is natural. And if you really think that mutilation is norm, it proves how undeveloped you are…
My opinion, which my friends support is that circumsiced penises are not only rare, but weird.
Erect, sure they all look the same, but when it comes to pleasuring a guy, uncircumsised are more sensitive, therefore more fun, and easy
out of allll the guys ive been with (which is over 15) only one has been circumsised. so yeah it is NOT exactly ‘the norm’
maybe in the usa they’re rare. not so much in europe!
If a rabbi puts his lips on a childs penis, is this acceptable behavior!
You can argue that a foreskin is natural, beneficial or even useful; I’ve heard girls say they prefer uncut for many reasons, but SEXY? Never. Even here I don’t see a single positive comments from a girl about how a foreskin LOOKS.
Although actually a foreskin isn’t all that useful. The evolutionary purpose of the foreskin was to protect the glans from spiny bushes and tall grass, back when humans didn’t wear clothes. Not quite so important with cotton undies. While people claim that an uncut penis is more sensitive, no scientific study has found a significant sensitivity difference either way. Besides, if uncut men really were over 9000 million billion times more sensitive than cut men as anti-circumcision types claim; wouldn’t that make uncut guys the worst premature ejaculators on earth? Since that doesn’t seem to be the case, I’m gonna guess that the studies are likely true.
Oh, and another interesting fact: the first study was done by Masters and Johnson, who noted that the near universal belief among their subjects (both cut and not) was that circumcised men were MORE sensitive, while uncut men were LESS. Funny how this has flipped 180 in 50 years. Yet M&J’s results still came back showing “no statistically significant difference”.
here’s one for ya: uncut penises look as good as cut ones.
If there was no statistically significant difference, then it’s not funny at all that this has “flipped 180.” It hasn’t, the group tested was just slightly different.
Also, you don’t know exactly what the evolutionary purpose of foreskin was, you can only speculate.
Not much of a point, I know, I was just bothered with your poor use of science and the fact that it was unchallenged. Also, because I have foreskin, which really isn’t a big deal one way or that other.
Actually there are several scientific studies that say uncut is more sensitive. Mainly the fact that the foreskin has 20,000 nerve endings so despite what people believe a cut man is in fact less sensitive.
the foreskin may be involved in many function:
the glide mechanic in sex and masturbation
retaining lubrication as less penile skin is withdrawn from the vagina
sensory, possibly communicates chemical signals involved with bonding during sex
the foreskin is rich in nerves, as such removing it may well reduce sensitivity. one reason this may not be prevalent is girls are not very adept at making the most of intact males.
you other comment that if sensation were significantly more in intact males they would prematurely ejaculate is unfounded, the mechanics of sex are completely different between cut and natural penises.
I am a girl and trust me, circumcision is only mutilation and not sexy at all. I personally do not know even single girl who would prefer circumcised, all of them loves that moment when the glans suddenly comes out from the skin, is multiple times more sexy that always fully exposed glans of circumcised men.
penises are fabulous foreskin or no foreskin. clean men are clean, dirty men are dirty; foreskin not-with-standing. most circumcised men were cut as babies and don’t remember it. It would be very painful for a grown man to have the foreskin removed. It’s probably just a coincidence but the 3 best lovers I ever had were all uncut.
It wasn’t coincidence, me and all my friends have the same experience. Uncut men give much more pleasure and the sensitivity in penis is significantly higher.
Men with foreskin have a significantly higher chance of receiving herpes or other STD’s. I have experienced both, foreskin is not better, a penis is a penis. but one with no foreskin does look better
ok, let’s see:
penis with foreskin has increased sensibility due to the extra skin, and no, it doesnt look better(at least to me), so don’t generalize such comentaries.
You need to correct this statement. The fact is men who don’t wear CONDOMS have a higher chance of contracting herpes and other STDs. Foreskin has literally nothing to do with it.
Wrong, cut men are just as likely to get STDs as uncut. Cutting has no effect at all on STDs.
i have no problem with people making the decision to be cut/uncut but i am glad my parents left the decision UP TO ME rather than having a doctor do it while i was too young to consent to a procedure that carries the slight possibility of rendering me incapable of having sex, and certainly eliminates tens of thousands of nerve endings.
in my rebellious teenage years i was sent to a boot camp where we were marched around in the desert for dozens of miles and got 1 gallon of water to bathe with once a week. i never ONCE got “smegma” or whatever you want to call it.
what is funny to me is that, since i’m not ashamed of it, it once came up in conversation with my male friends that i was uncut. the cut men i know seem MUCH more preoccupied with the state of my foreskin than any woman i’ve ever been with. i’ve even had a girl tell me she slept with me because she heard i was uncut and wanted to know what it was like!
F**k any bitch who doesn’t think the penis a man is born with is not normal
lol, you foreskin haters do realize that circumcision is the minority? It’s almost never done in other countries outside of the US. And I think the pathetically low voluntary circumcision rates sort of speak for themselves. That’s how a penis is supposed to look, and should look. Circumcision is completely awful, and if you’d ever seen it done on a new born I think you might change your mind as well, it’s pretty horrifying.
I am a bit unique in this conversation. My penis is both cut and uncut. Perhaps I should clarify something: my parents had a trained medical doctor cut off my foreskin, but it didn’t work. I don’t know all the details (I was three days old at the time and I kinda don’t want to know more than I already do), but I do know that I have a scar down the length of my penis. It is no problem to clean, at all.
I know you won’t believe me because I don’t have a true citation or quote, but I read something to the effect of the following on MSNBC or CNN in a serious news story over circumcision a few months ago: “I’m a gay man, and I’ve had cut and uncut lovers. (I am circumcised.) I’ve noticed one thing among them all, and that is that uncut penises get up faster, get up harder, and last longer.”
To put it another way: sex and masturbation with a foreskin is still /very/ good. I was born (more or less, considering the scar) this way, and I choose to stay this way. Any child of mine that is born a guy will be made well aware that he is uncut, and I will encourage him to make his own choice, or at least to think about it. If some moving force, a deity, a faith, a desire to fit in pushes him to want a circumcision, I will not stop him. The “health benefits” of circumcision have been concluded to be related to the regularity of cleaning under the foreskin (IE: if you go into the desert and don’t take a shower for weeks, guess who gets an infection, but regular cleaning makes this not happen) and are dismissed as insufficiently supported by the various medical professions.
To all you girls out there who think that an uncircumcised penis isn’t sexy, just remember http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2cYWfq–Nwl (Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger). To all of you circumcised guys who think circumcision makes you better, Freud would have a field day, as you are dicks (considering that you focus purely on the tip of it to pass even a little judgment against me). To all you girls out there who don’t care whether it’s cut or not, GOOD FOR YOU!
To my fellow Americans, Happy Fourth!
Are babies rllaey at risk of catching AIDS through unprotected sex? Last I checked, infants weren’t going around having sex. ha ha! (Maybe I just haven’t asked the right babies)And my common-sense side tells me that if circumcision rllaey reduced HIV, the US gay population wouldn’t have such an AIDS crisis within it’s mostly circumcised community. I’m pretty sure abstinence and/or condom use without fail are the only methods that will protect agains HIV. I just have a real problem giving consent for surgery on my child unless I know there is a dire health need, like cardiac surgery or something. I can not speak to the religious aspect of circumcision as it’s not something my religion practices (thankfully! – ouch!).
I agree, as an experienced woman this is totally true:
“uncut penises get up faster, get up harder, and last longer”
whats gross is guys don’t wipe when they getting done peeing… the shake doesn’t always work.
As my girlfriend said during our first sexual encounter, when she took my freshly-washed penis out of my boxers, “Oh wow! You’re not cut; I’ve always wanted to play with one of these!” Two years later, we’re still having great sex together.
OP is a shallow cunt and it’s a her loss she’s going to have to miss out on all of the great guys who happen to have that extra piece of skin… which is 75% of them, by the way. More for the rest of us!
It’s not “extra” – it’s something you came with.
OP should take a good look at her own flaps before she calls other people’s parts UGLY.
Guys, don’t bother with a girl who cares about looks over how your cock functions. Chances are she’s not very good in bed anyway, she won’t put in much effort to begin with, since it’s all about how the cock LOOKS.
I’ve had cut and uncut men, and it’s interesting to note that MANY (not all) of the cut guys say they don’t enjoy deepthroating.. because they can’t feel it, and prefer just the tip sucked. Only the tip!! Or altogether don’t think oral sex is that enjoyable at all. How boring is that! And how much are they missing out!
Whereas the uncut guys always enjoy and have no problems cumming at all. It’s really annoying sucking an circumcised one sometimes, it’s dry, calloused, and it’s like just “mouthing over” a DILDO. In uncut ones, you have better traction with the moving parts. That skin, is really FUN to play with!
OP supports baby mutilation. Perhaps she thinks there’s something enjoyable about having one’s genitals sliced apart?
Perhaps she’d like to test this theory?
Just a tid-bit of info. My last ex after giving me the first of many bj’s we started some pillow talk. She was describing my member as “nice n cut” She was in disbelief when i told her i was uncut. She had to take a second look because while hard it looks cut, flaccid it obviously looks uncut. It all depends on the penis. Its all personal taste
I’m a girl with an uncut boyfriend, and his penis is the nicest one I’ve ever seen!
First of all, if you’re sucking a dick and you can feel the foreskin, you’re doing it all wrong and apparently you’re not arousing him at all, because the foreskin retracts when a penis becomes erect. The only thing the skin can do when the penis is erect is move back and forth, which makes it WAY easier to give satisfying manual stimulation or oral. The lack of a foreskin DOES reduce a man’s sensitivity. Lightly scratch the palm of your hand, and consider the pleasant tickle-y feeling, the nerves that cause that feeling are the same ones that are found in a man’s foreskin. Second of all, when a baby boy (or any male) is cut, that sensitive V of skin on the underside of the penis is usually destroyed further making a penis LESS sensitive to pleasure.
Lastly, I generally find sex better with uncut men and I will give you the reason why:
A cut penis’s pleasure comes solely from the head of the penis, so a man who is cut with thrust more shallowly in order to stimulate the head of his penis with the tighter opening of the vagina. A man who is uncut has sensitive nerve endings in the rolling tube of foreskin which means that he will thrust more deeply and stay CLOSER to his partner.. Which means that she’ll receive more stimulation (any by the way, the female clitoris is more sensitive to pressure than to friction, which means it’s better when your partner is closer to you)
So, yes, it is a matter of personal taste, but in the end, I would say that I want a penis/boyfriend that pleases me in the bedroom rather than one that I find beautiful and doesn’t please me. (and I DO find my boyfriend’s penis beautiful.. and functional. so yay for me, I’m not a shallow bitch.)
I totally agree with you
This whole thing is so dumb! The only reason it has as many comments as it does is because the post offends people. I am a male with an uncircumcised penis and it doesn’t seem to be a big deal one way or the other. I have a great sex life and a clean penis. That is all.
Wow, i learned a lot on this thread. I’m uncut [i was born in europe]and I have been always hesitant to tell my girlfriends that I was. Surprisingly to me they hadn’t even noticed [i'm young so most of the time it was the girls first time]. Uncut penises and cut penises look very similar erect unless the guy has too much foreskin. American girls shouldn’t be so arrogant — try a guy with foreskin, and then tell me whats wrong with it. Until then you are just a shallow, sad human being.
Some news for you fellows. The more man evolves from being a monkey towards being part of some civilisation, the more circumcision takes place. 1) if you think it lowers pleasure, come suck my dick and come enjoye some tropical rain, we’ll see after that what you think about if I do have less pleasure. 2) if you say that you prefer the intact way nature made you, then stop washing your fucking ass crack, smelly ugly monkey genitalia, stop cutting hair, stop cutting nails on both hands and feet, do not brush your fucking teeth anymore and wait for it to all fall apart at age 30 to 35, and then we’ll continue the conversation, fucking chimpanze retards. 3) ancient egypt, ancient hebrews and actual jewish people, muslims that were among the brightest for centuries –> all practiced circumsition and they keep going for nowadays. + When some people reach enough progress and realise that having some piece of smelly crap that used to be useful for monkeys in jungle is no longer useful, like having 3 inch fucking fingernails, you cut it. End of fucking story, that’s why they do it in USA, in South Korea, and more and more in Japan, not mentionning all of south asia because they’re muslims (indonesia, malaysia, etc.) And that’s maybe also why the WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION strongly advices it to cure some diseases and prevent many others, and of course lower rates of STDs… stop being monkeys and pigs you pieces of shit, and join the civilized world, cut your fucking fingernails, your fucking smelly foreskin, brush your teeth and keep your mouths shut in the process, you underlings.
Oh yeah I just forgot something actually…you know how humans grow less and less hair from 50000 years ago to nowadays ? guess what’s evolution’s next step ? they are some baby boys, more and more and more of them among the world who are born without any foreskin…evolution makes it this way, so some smarter homo sapiens try to level it up, get over it monkeys, that’s towards where the specie goes on
realistic dude is just mad cause they chopped of too much when he was cut and not his penis lookes deformed.
My ex of 5 years was not circumcised and I couldn’t bear to give him oral and thought that maybe I just wasn’t into giving oral fullstop, thankfully I tried a clean cut circumsized, beautiful, lover with stamina I had never experienced before, not to mention the complete absence of smell of stickiness. Now I love to give oral and would never ever ever ever ever EVER go back to an uncircumcised penis again. They are disgusting.
THE NORM IN ISLAM FOR BOYS TO BE CIRCUMCISED AND FOR GIRLS TO REMOVE PART OF THE HOOD IF IT WAS NEEDED(IN CASE OF EXCESS FORESKIN). DONE!
I’m I the only one that doesn’t see being circumcised and not circumcised as not a huge deal out all!
NEWSFLASH to all you women that love uncircumcised penis’s and call circumcised penis’s “mutilated” or “ugly” or unnatural! Us Circumcised males are just as normal as the uncircumcised males! Just because we don’t have that extra amount of foreskin doesn’t mean we are some sick abomination that can never feel pleasure!
I was circumcised when I was a baby, I don’t even really think about it that much!
I agree that the OP is a bit of an idiot, but I dont think trying to demonize circumcised males is really any better!
I mean why should I feel bad about the look of my genitalia, should I start judging you because you have A cup boobs instead of C cup boobs and vice versa?
Uncut cocks have shiny hoods which are soft & sensitive. Also it’s nice to give a hand job without having to use that god awful lube…it’s so gross & embarrassing to buy. Plus there are more things you can do with an uncut cock. I honestly don’t know why people find uncut unattractive. To me an uncut cock is like a present waiting to be unwrapped.
I agree, it is exactly like you’ve said “uncut cock is like a present waiting to be unwrapped”
this was some funny shit i read in here today!
Cut that nasty shit off. It is ugly, smells gross and just because your man has it, or the guys on here defending it (again because they have it) does not make it any less nasty. Proven fact that removing it changes things for the better and leads to less infections for the guy and the girl. IF it were so hygienic there wouldn’t be a problem, now would there?
here is your article if you want to read it:
I am a guy, circumcised and guess what? my dick doesn’t have to have some proper washing technique to get it clean. Oh and the women you think love it un-cut? well they would fuck anything with a dick, so don’t feel special. The ones who have any taste or class at all, want a clean cut one.
“The ones who have any taste or class at all, want a clean cut one.” ridiculous, such girls definitely prefer natural uncut
Personly I love foreskin! My boyfriend has one and honestly I find it great! He gets so much pleasure out of everything I do and I love hearing him moan from how good it feels. I can’t believe I’m the first one on here to say that I think foreskin is sexy! I like the way it looks, it’s natural. Whether it helps or hurts someone, I am really against permanently changing any part of someone’s body at birth. There’s nothing wrong with being circumsized but it should be the man’s own choice, no parent should make a permanent change to their child’s body in any way unless it’s to save their life.
circumcision is a crime when forced on a baby , and i am a victim of that. american doctors need to go to prison for their sex crimes period
Let me give you a perspective from the gay side of the whole thing. Uncut cocks are NASTY! I don’t care how well you clean or how OCG your hygiene routine is, there is still an odor and that’s just not the case with a circumcised cock. “You are mutilating a young boy.” It is actually saving them a lot of trouble. If you decide to get circumcised as a adult it is not that easy and very painful. If done at birth there is no memory of it so get it done then. There are foreskin fetishes though just like any other fetish. To each his own. If you like foreskin then good for you. I am very, very glad my parents decided to have me circumcised. For those gay men that chose to play Russian Roulette with their health and be promiscuous, that is one of the first questions that is asked up front to the person they are cruising, “cut or uncut.” Cut or uncut – always play safe. Use a condom every single time even with your partner because he/she can cheat on you and bring home something to you that Ajax won’t take off. Sex ain’t worth risking your life over. Just sayin.
14 years ago today I was circumcised. I was 27 years old. Spent a long time in the hiptosal with lung issues, lumps developed at the end of my foreskin. During a check-up I had mentioned the lumps bothered me. Found a urologist that told me he would biopsy the very most end of the foreskin while keeping the integrity of the foreskin intact. This monster raped me. An incredibly tight circumcision. No inner tissue left, not a single cell of frenulum left. God how I hate my life now. Good luck Foregen, and tanks for giving me hope.
Personally, I’ve never suffered from loss of self-esteem, but I do very much reregt being cut when I was young it has severely impaired my ability to lead a normal sex life through extreme loss of sensitivity.I’ve experimented with various restoration methods before, but found them mostly impractical or painful. The technique used by Foregen really does offer me great excitement that in the not too distant future it will be possible to be restored to fully normal sexual function something I’ve never had the chance to experience. Looking forward to hearing how the project is progressing.
Mail (will not be published) (required)
Content and data copyright by The Yes Column. All rights reserved.